WelcomeWEFreedomWindsorEssexCounty-ActionCommunicationsRalliesResourcesSocialEventsWednesdayNightMeetings-ActivismAgoraAgorismCanadaCommonLawCommunityDataCentersDataCentresDoocracyFarmersMarketIntroductionsNaturalLawNewslettersOntarioOrganizingOutreachProjexProjexWikiRalliesResistanceAnalysisSoireesSoiréesWikiSpooksWindsorElectionsTop Subs
8
Controligarchy - - (+7|-0)
Woke Economics(self)
3 commentsbyJasonCarswell

I don't care whether you are Left or Right.

A century or two ago our great great grandmothers lived when land was unjustly taken from First Nations, and if you think I my rights must be infringed to make up for it, then you are woke and helping ruin the West.

A century or two ago our great great grandfathers lived when crimes happened to Black folks, and if you think I my rights must be infringed to make up for it, then you are woke and susceptible to propaganda.

A century ago our grandfathers lived when odious debt was pressed upon my nation by corrupt "representative" villains, and if you think I should be paying for their sins, then you are economically woke.

If you believe the debt is okay and must be paid by us when I didn't agree to it, then you are economically woke.

If you believe printing currencies manipulated by unelected villains is fine then you are economically woke.

If our grandchildren and great great grandchildren must suffer under debt slavery for what happens in my lifetime, then you are economically woke.

It's long past time to reject the usury fallacies that prop up the exploitative systems and suppress the natural and human worlds.

Comment preview

[-]JasonCarswell4(+3|0)

It said +3?

parentlinkreply
[-]x0x72(+1|0)

I have code I'm sitting on that would fix it. I honestly don't know why it's skipping you. Sometimes it's best to re-write. I've done that.. but it turned out a inch more simple to make it with a single combined text post and link post form. Plus I wanted to see what that would look like. And I've debated making that live because I'm not sure people will like the combined form. Will it confuse? So I've sat on the code.

Other benefits. All bonuses would add rather than compete. The bonus message updates live with a very clear breakdown as you use the form. The same code applies the bonus as presented it so it will always match.

I probably could get it working on seperate forms.

The way the single form works currently is you could add either a link or text, and if you happen to give it both it turns the text into a starter comment.

Update: Added points for this one.
Sample form: https://goatmatrix.net/submit/

Don't submit with it. It's a prototype.

parentlinkreply
[-]JasonCarswell2(+1|0)

Thanks for the info. Code is all Greek to me.

I don't care about votes or bonus points (IMO should be separate), but I do care about message visibility (the point of forums) - and I do care that SubMatrix works as advertised so it doesn't dissuade folks from using it - thus I bug-report when I stumble on them. I don't know if/how this statement contradicts or complements what you are working on.

The self-detecting submit-something uni-form is a great idea.

Thanks for your attention on this - and everything else.
I trust you and that's why I'm here.
Thank you for your FOEPATCHISM e-service.

parentlinkreply