WelcomeWEFreedomWindsorEssexCounty-ActionCommunicationsRalliesResourcesSocialEventsWednesdayNightMeetings-ActivismAgoraAgorismCanadaCommonLawCommunityDataCentersDataCentresDoocracyFarmersMarketIntroductionsNaturalLawNewslettersOntarioOrganizingOutreachProjexProjexWikiRalliesResistanceAnalysisSoireesSoiréesWikiSpooksWindsorElectionsTop Subs
6
Filmmaking - - (+5|-0)
Award Winning Short Film "I, Pet Goat II" alludes to the Work of Kenneth Anger. It's Packed with Symbolism. Some See Predictions of Current Day Events in it. Is This a Film Equivalent of the Illuminati! Card Game?(youtu.be)
6 commentsbyLarrySwinger
Add topics

Comment preview

[-]LarrySwinger1(+1|0)

@JasonCarswell can you see the similarity with Lucifer Rising. This was definitely produced by the killuminati.

parentlinkreply
[-]x0x71(+1|0)

I didn't know this was the second one. It makes me wonder if I've ever seen the first one.

parentlinkreply
[-]JasonCarswell
2(+2|0)

IIRC, there is no first one, and with the correct font and if you squint it reads something different. Or maybe it was the II is the twin towers. And I think if you translate the title or think of the letters different it has other meanings. It's been a while and I didn't care that much.

Like the "M" logo for the Monster drink company is three slashes that happen to say 666 in Hebrew.

There are some article and video breakdowns of the symbolism in this video. Great production value.

parentlinkreply
[-]LarrySwinger1(+1|0)

The first one was even better but unfortunately it got lost between the cracks of time.

Fun fact the name is a reference to a Mandela effect. Apparently the book George Bush read from on 9/11 wasn't called "My Pet Goat". There's a story in the book he was reading that's called The Pet Goat. This is explained by documentaries reporting the name incorrectly though, since that's probably what most of us know it from.

Also this got sent to Filmmaking incorrectly. I was filling in the category and then it autocompletes it to something I didn't mean. This is the second time this has happened you may wanna fix this.

parentlinkreply
[-]x0x71(+1|0)

I guess I need some clarity to try to reproduce the bug. What was the intended category?

Edit: I think I see the issue. I think the issue is that tab is a common button used for auto-complete and for navigating to the next field in a form. I'm going to have to think about this one because tab really is the correct button for both things but it can't do both roles.

parentlinkreply
[-]LarrySwinger1(+1|0)

Oh yeah that's annoying af, tab policy should be set by the browser. That's like hijacking the functionality of ^k. I didn't even realize it was because of tab, I only noticed it after the fact.

parentlinkreply