Welcome to Windsor & Essex County Freedom's forum...
Break the Facebook addiction, avoid A.I. slop, scams, and online drama.
[WEFreedom.SubMatrix.net] focuses on local community political
ACTION + COMMUNICATIONS + ORGANIZING
for Windsor, Essex County, and beyond, with minimal drama.
== Priorities of this [SubMatrix.net] community ==
- alternatives, solutions, trade-offs
- autonomy, critical-thinking, mutual-respect, truth-seeking
- local news, processing info, producing media
(print, video, web, etc.), sharing & outreach - projects of all sorts (research, plan, execute, distribute, resolve)
== Online features include ==
- this [SubMatrix.net] forum to post and comment
- [Chat] and private chats with individuals or custom groups
- [messages] and private messages
- [Gvid.TV] video library
- [Img.Gvid.TV] image bank
- [Projex.Wiki] interactive documentation
- more
Also find lots about us, our calendar of events, organizing,
more information, and resources on the wiki anyone may join...
== Announcements ==
- WEFreedom has a new forum!
== Urgent ==
- 2026-06-29 Mon - City Hall
We need to audit (sit in), take notes, process, develop action, publish.
== Calendar ==
- 2026-06-27 Sat - Banwell Church car wash to raise lunch money for Marlborough School
- 2026-06-28 Sun - Canadian Fiesta! monthly soirée
- 2026-07-01 Wed - Canada Day
Every 2nd & 4th Wednesday, 7pm @ The Lions' Den
== Classifieds ==
Local folks and businesses need local support.
(more soon)
== Recommended ==
- /s/ArtificialIntelligence
- /s/Canada
- /s/Controligarchy
- /s/Health
- /s/PoliticalAnalysis
- /s/VaccineSkepticism
- /s/Voluntaryism
- /s/WEFreedom
- /s/Windsor
- /s/Zionism
== Questions? ==
If you have questions contact
- [FAQ] (frequently asked questions)
- JasonCarswell (aka Santa Libertas)
- x0x7 (genius-coder and admin-extraordinaire)
== WEFreedom folks ==
WEFreedom folks can see who has joined this forum,
encourage more participation, and connect here.
[User list goes here.]
== Critical concepts ==
Agora (Greek) is an open place for markets and people to assemble for
various purposes, like a town square.
Agorism
- Social philosophy advocating creating a society with voluntary
exchanges and relations between people via aspects of
counter-economics and nonviolent revolution.
Do-ocracy
- An organizational structure in which individuals choose roles and
tasks for themselves and execute them wherein responsibilities attach
to people who do the work, rather than elected or selected officials. - http://Projex.Wiki/wiki/Do-ocracy
FOEPATCHISM
- Fair, Open, Ethical, Peaceful, Accountable, Transparent, Consistent,
Honest, Inclusive Social Management - for collaborators, communities,
families, governments, groups, homes, organizations, social media,
societies, teams, workplaces, etc. "Foe" = enemy; "patch" = correction. - http://Projex.Wiki/wiki/FOEPATCHISM
Libertas = autonomy, freedom, sovereignty.
Phylaxis
- (medical) The protection against infection.
- (defensive) Guarding against cultural destruction, cyber warfare,
ideological subversion, malicious infiltration, medical tyranny,
political corruption, psychological operations, wealth theft, and
weaponized migration.
Voluntaryism
- Peaceful life without rulers, yet with social rules.
- The common sense idea that all forms of human association should be voluntary...
with the assertion that any act of violence [or coercion] other than self defense,
whether by an individual or organization, is illegitimate and unlawful. - Voluntary interactions - without rulers rather than supporting and suffering
under mafia governments and corporatocracy's monopoly on violence.
This includes what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own wallets,
bedrooms, bodies, businesses, and communities. - http://Projex.Wiki/wiki/Meaningful_liberty#Voluntaryism







You have to remember that I have his submissions to the site feedback, so I have more data with which to "infer" motive. Not so much infer, as simply read what he's written. He's been entirely two faced this entire time.
All of his posts are in a dugout table. I'll get them all back besides what was posted after ban evasion. I had a busy day the next day and it was the end of the day and I needed to take care of it quickly. And by it I mean lock everything down really quick in response to someone who has been issuing threats to the site in one channel and being chummy in another. And that meant using the available tools to get him off the site, on account that he wasn't willing to accept a ban that he 100% earned and he knows that.
That was the point for him. To earn a ban in one channel that's private, and look innocent in channels that are public. This is what trolls do. But keeping him around would just be keeping an antagonist around the site longer, and so once he earned a just ban, perfect, he's gone. I know Neol said that I created drama right before I left. I'm not trying to be corrective of Neol, but just clairify, I was responding to drama he was trying to force. I want drama minimalism. That's why trolls can't really be a part of our culture. Trolls will always create situations that require drama. That's their point. The way to minimize it is to have fewer trolls on the site in general. I gave him a chance. I gave him a chance well past the point that I recognized that he was choosing to be a problem, hoping either that he would change his tune, or that I could indicate the problem to others and he would get negative social feedback realizing being a troll here wouldn't get him points with this crowd. If we want a nice website, not voat, and not censored, then social feedback has to be the medium. And it can't just come from me.
Most of us a pro-freespeech. We all don't like the lemmy model or the reddit model. So what this site really is is a claim that the social model of making a site nice should be enough. It's not a proven thesis. But we should try. But trolls who claim to be for free speech are going to try to disprove that model. Who knows, maybe they are right. They are going put forward the proposition, censor me or have nothing decent. But I want to believe the social model has a shot. But that requires a consistency, that trolls aren't cool.
Trolls are going to come, and eventually they are going to escalate until they do something actually worthy of a ban. That's what they do. And their hope is to damage the rep of the admin in trying to bait a ban. Don't give them that satisfaction or you will just get more trolls, because they can see that their behavior did something of consequence.
Better is that when one actully does get a ban, it's uncerimoneous. It just happens and people move on. Best is if they lose social steam with the community for their trolly behavior well early and get bored before they ever escalate to something that gets them a ban. This is what I wish the site could do.
JC, I'm going to send you a priv chat about one request, if you can look at that. https://goatmatrix.net/chat/aGKVGZ
I couldn't agree more. (Too bad zyxzevn and folks like them haven't come here yet.)
Whether it was an asstroll's joke threat or he really did contact cxxxrxxxx authorities, that is beyond ban-worthy. If/when I ever get a forum up, because I believe people may improve I have an idea for an expiring three strikes system. Now I must revise it, as a ban for that kind of threat should not expire.
Freedom of speech (and reach) does not mean freedom of abuse, conflict, harm, and noise.
Agreed. History complicated this one. Profoundly great shame. Another sad day for what was SaidIt.
Well, yeah, it was more correct to say he started drama and you continued it, but really I meant it could be easily predicted the drama would continue while you would be offline, that's what I meant by "unwise".
Yeah. I can agree with you. Basically it was a situation where I felt both options were potentially unwise and I had to act on one of them. I missed one of his accounts. So he was able to make a post advocating for himself, trying to paint himself as the nice guy, which in the end isn't the end of the world.
He had been trying to stir drama with me for some time, and maybe if anything I was too soft on him and should have acted sooner with a ban. But it felt like he was really trying to bring it to a head right then and there.
All because he took exception to me thinking that manners are more based than not having manners. It's funny. We have some strange psuedo/neo-traditionalists, who adopted "traditionalism" rather than growing up with it. Proper traditionalism tries to aspire to all the positive traits a society can develop and accumulate over a long time. There are a lot of people who pretend to be "based", but really they have just devorced them from any decency. An actual traditional society would reject them instantly.
Me, I'm for both. I'm an optimalist. I want the best of everything that is new and old. Recognizing that only about 15% of what's new is actually good, and about 60% of what's old is good.
But some of these people who pretend to espouse values don't really have any of the ideologies they claim they have. They have no values at all. They just want an thin vailed excuse to be an asshat. That's the only thing they care about.
So when you take that one thing away from them, and say all views are welcome, just be mature about it, they throw a tantrum. I would have never guessed it would have lasted so long. Who knows, maybe it isn't over. He is perhase that much of a child.
But maybe, he wasn't really upset about that. This is where the 50% possible theory that he came with the express intent to do harm comes from. It's almost unbelievable that someone would throw that large a tantrum over something that small. So what if.. that was the only excuse he could find to be angry? But to be angry and try to damage the site was set in stone from the beginning? He's a very imbalanced person whichever one is true.
You may do as you please on your site. But I would be highly entertained to have these posts shared and he be unbanned, for the sake of drama. I do love a good internet drama.
Well, we are trying to be a low drama site. We have been longer than he had been here. When I explained that to a new cohort of users he claimed it was some bait and switch, which it wasn't, and he's thrown a tantrum ever sense.
With the exception of two users who are really upset by someone trying to make a lower drama site and trying to force it, the site has been mostly drama free.
Basically the idea is I don't hate mosh pits, but they exist in one part of a concert and not the whole thing. And you wouldn't try to force a mosh pit in a coffee house. Well what if you want to operate a coffee house, or any other kind of venue. There should be allowed to be more than one kind of venue on the internet. And the person operating it should be able to indicate what the place is. And ideally this should be possible without reddit style censorship on 90% of the internet. Otherwise the trolls have proven that the reddit model is correct. Which I sure don't want to be the case.
They deleted the account's content history because I said it wasn't actually D3.
I could tell.
And it wasn't, D3.
It certainly doesn't sound like the d3rr we once new.
The beenPoisoned's history ends 2 months ago.
Apparently there's more to this story with alts that I haven't seen.
It's not D3.
Bank on it.
I am skeptical.
Some seems in character, some does not.
I have seen no proof either way, yet.
The history is back. It is D3. Maybe a mental lapse happened.
Link the history please.
I've only seen /u/beenPoisoned and that ended 2 months ago.