WelcomeWEFreedomWindsorEssexCounty-ActionCommunicationsRalliesResourcesSocialEventsWednesdayNightMeetings-ActivismAgoraAgorismCanadaCommonLawCommunityDataCentersDataCentresDoocracyFarmersMarketIntroductionsNaturalLawNewslettersOntarioOrganizingOutreachProjexProjexWikiRalliesResistanceAnalysisSoireesSoiréesWikiSpooksWindsorElectionsTop Subs
4
PoliticalAnalysis - - (+3|-0)
The Week with Ginger, wk.15 (32:08) ~ Ginger Theory(www.youtube.com)
7 commentsbyJasonCarswell
Add topics

Comment preview

[-]Tom_Bombadil4(+3|0)

This ginger is far more knowledgeable than I originally expected.

Her research on Candace Owens Strongly implies she's controlled opposition.

parentlinkreply
[-]JasonCarswell2(+1|0)

Perhaps. I still give her the benefit of doubt.

A lot of her shows are blusterous rants without focus and might be better if edited down. This one was okay, good enough to share. She simply seems to be anti-establishment. We need more like her. IMO, she'd do better to leave the faith stuff out. And she has a gorgeous face under that silly mask.

I really like her work on Candace and Tucker. I can't say for sure, but I suspect she is basically an aggregator and presenter of counter-narrative information gathered from the corners of the Internet. Anyone as big and old and connected as Candace and Tucker will have a history of people that don't like them for one reason or another - thus there'd be a long trail to pick up. The other part of it is being familiar enough with the influencer's content to see when they counter their own past and statements.

parentlinkreply
[-]Tom_Bombadil2(+1|0)

Implies Candace is controlled opposition, but not Ginger.

Ginger is great.

But those are some broad shoulders, and the mask is also interesting.

Ginger pretty much calls it like it is, so it's not an altogether bad idea to wear a mask; if it doesn't bother the audience.

Something about Eric Stoltz Mask Morty.

parentlinkreply
[-]JasonCarswell2(+1|0)

Oh, I thought you meant Ginger was the controlled op. Candace for sure. Few (or no one) can get that far without being controlled. Ian Carroll is a curious case. Time may tell.

Yes, Ginger is fat, with a gorgeous face. She's masking the wrong parts. Not everyone will see all of her content, so besides the few exceptions maybe it's worth keeping the mask on. And no one is watching for the riveting imagery.

parentlinkreply
[-]Tom_Bombadil2(+1|0)

Ian Carroll is friends with the current veep.

His logo is
interesting.

The lower case "i" has an eye and can see.

Surrounded by the double c (33).

Tells you all you need to know.

parentlinkreply
[-]JasonCarswell2(+1|0)

Fascinating, but definitely not all I need to know.

I used an eye in my WickedSunshine.com logo - as I was an animator/designer. It's not an exclusive icon.

He's smarter than the average influencer. He also doesn't talk about his personal life much. And he vibe-codes with AI. While being on target on all topics without much to criticize, IMO. I'm waiting and watching for flubs - and not just him - all the top tier folks (Corbett, Webb, Broze, Cristian, etc. too).

parentlinkreply
[-]Tom_Bombadil1(0|0)

I'm close to certain that Corbett plagiarized the work of Alan Watt, because he had it all figured out long before Corbett made his first video.

Alan Watt was the real deal. He's easily the most knowledgeable and authentic of any before or since.

As knowledgeable as I know that you are, I bet you could pick any of the hundreds of hours of interviews he's done and learn about something new. He's the guy who's already forgotten more than you or I ever knew. No doubt about it.

https://cuttingthroughthematrix.com/audio.html

The Council on Foreign Relations sent him an invitation him to speak, and they were probably interested in co-opting him, but he refused. The firewood wasn't going to chop itself.

He passed away in 2021, and I hadn't heard of him until his passing because Jeff Censored mentioned his passing and asserted "he was the real deal."

The people you mentioned occasionally reference the others on your list. But they never mention Alan Watt. Why do you suppose that is?

parentlinkreply