WelcomeWEFreedomWindsorEssexCounty-ActionCommunicationsRalliesResourcesSocialEventsWednesdayNightMeetings-ActivismAgoraAgorismCanadaCommonLawCommunityDataCentersDataCentresDoocracyFarmersMarketIntroductionsNaturalLawNewslettersOntarioOrganizingOutreachProjexProjexWikiRalliesResistanceAnalysisSoireesSoiréesWikiSpooksWindsorElectionsTop Subs
9
Polls - - (+8|-0)
Which of these events do you think is more likely by 2126?(self)
7 commentsbyx0x7

Future polls:

Worth it to de-google?
https://submatrix.net/c/Polls/BjPyQBdpwP

What search engine do you use?
https://submatrix.net/c/Polls/CzzNLfqAyj

Comment preview

[-]pumpkin5(+5|-1)

There is already research on so-called 'biological reset switches', which would reduce cellular ageing and repair the molecular damage that accumulates over time. Thus a human could live longer than 120 years of age if enough of these ageing cells were repaired or replaced, perhaps reaching 137 years, so I've selected that one.

Historically hoarding wealth doesn't last longer than a few decades and is otherwise distributed to other family members (eg. Rothschild, Walton, Al Saud, Al Thani &c) or shareholders (JP Morgan Chase, BlackRock, Vanguard, Fidelity, &c). Multiply by 100 Vanguard's $10 trillion to get a quadrillion, and still that's owned by shareholders. And peasants normally revolt when they've lost everything.

parentlinkreply
[-]x0x73(+2|0)

Interesting. I know lists like the Forbes most wealthy list can only track new money. Wealth is hard to observe from the outside. You have to watch them make it to know they are wealthy. So it can only be observed for a generation or a few.

Wealth is just a capacity to claim command of resources at a later date. So wealth isn't mutually exclusive. With consumption of resources that's another story. So if you wanted to see how much someone displaces the well-being of others you'd look at what resources they use up. Net worth itself doesn't make other people poor.

parentlinkreply
[-]JasonCarswell3(+2|0)

Don't forget mental health is wealth - and is connected to greater wealth.

Believing lies, doing drugs, no self-control, no self-discipline, nor self-reliance.

Many of these wealthy folks, ironically or not, do these negative things - but also impose these widely to the masses with lucrative propaganda, religions, historical revisionism, drug wars across centuries, distracting media, bread & circuses, fluoride, etc.

parentlinkreply
[-]HiddenFox3(+2|0)

I think living 50000 Days is far more likely. Out of curiosity, if we find a way to "upload" a person's consciousness to a digital platform like a robot would that count?

parentlinkreply
[-]RickSanchez3(+2|0)

https://www.fightaging.org/archives/2023/02/alternative-approaches-to-the-treatment-of-mitochondrial-aging-at-the-sens-research-foundation SENS treatment seems to halt aging, but you have to get it early enough in your 20s or 30s, and only the rich can afford it.

parentlinkreply
[-]JasonCarswell3(+2|0)

I'd guess the Rothschilds and/or the King might be quadrillionaires, depending how you count things up - though if you count corporations as people then maybe BlackRock, Vanguard, and the other one might already be there too.

If no one has claimed rights to the Earth's core, then I do so declare it belongs to me - and now I have more gold and diamonds than anyone else on Earth.

50,000 days on Earth is about 137 years. It wouldn't surprise me if there was an old Asian lady without a birth certificate that old somewhere. In the bible, allegedly, people lived for centuries - until someone did some gain-of-function bullshittery. If corporations are people, there's got to be a bunch. The USofA is 250.

R.I.P. East-India Company lasted from 1600 to 1874.

R.I.P. Hudson's Bay Company lasted from 1670 to 2025 and died last year at 355 years old.

parentlinkreply
[-]JasonCarswell3(+2|0)

I only see a glitch in the Matrix.

The poll's vigor has been restored.

parentlinkreply