WelcomeWEFreedomWindsorEssexCounty-ActionCommunicationsRalliesResourcesSocialEventsWednesdayNightMeetings-ActivismAgoraAgorismCanadaCommonLawCommunityDataCentersDataCentresDoocracyFarmersMarketIntroductionsNaturalLawNewslettersOntarioOrganizingOutreachProjexProjexWikiRalliesResistanceAnalysisSoireesSoiréesWikiSpooksWindsorElectionsTop Subs
5
conspiracy - - (+4|-0)
List of monarchs who were Freemasons - Wikipedia(en.wikipedia.org)
6 commentsbyLarrySwinger
Add topics

Comment preview

[-]LarrySwinger2(+2|0)

Of note here is Bavaria, who would have a masonic king shortly after that country outlawed the Illuminati, whose stated goal was to infiltrate freemasonry, and which they had already achieved by that point. In other words, outlawing the Illuminati was completely unsuccessful (as other documents prove as well). They only gained more power to the point that one of their people ruled the country.

Also of note is that probably a lot of these kings are way from way before freemasonry went public in 1717. There's no doubt that freemasonry is older than that date as the term appears in print in the 1630s already, but I always had the impression that it was obscure back then and yet to gain power, not that fucking kings were masons.

Thirdly I will note that a lot of these don't list a source so they need to be double-checked.

@JasonCarswell @Tom_Bombadil @soundsituation

parentlinkreply
[-]Tom_Bombadil1(+1|0)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_X

A cross is a Masonic symbol. The Son rises in the east, crosses the sky, and dies at sun Set.

"Set" killed the son "Horus", at SunSet.

The sun appears/disappears at the Hor-(us)-izon.

The son crosses (x) the sky, and "X" is a cross. The mystery sun religion Aton (they rearrange letters sometimes, ge. NATO) precedes the end of the ice age, and it has persevered the knowledge of the ancient past. The names of these groups change, but the symbols remain through the millennia.

The Egyptian Pharos were members, as well. The cross (X) the primary symbol of the sarcophagus below. The hands and arms "cross" by forming an X, and the hook and the rod do the same. In fact, the two crosses symbolize the double-cross (with various meanings).
https://forums.canadiancontent.net/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2007%2F11_01%2FsarcophL0411_468x1385.jpg&hash=2122625a89929959c156a87c7ef6bdd5

Elon Musk renamed Twitter X, and the x is symbolical included in so many ways it goes unnoticed. MotorX (motorcross), xbox... I'm sure you can think of hundreds of examples.

A single mystery religion rules the world, and much of what we assume is a lie. The mystery religion created the Bible, Christianity, and every other major religion, as a divide and conquer tactic, but the leadership on all sides worked together.

The European monarchs all descended from the same ethnic group during the Norman invasion, and aristocrats always intermarry. The same applies in every monarchy a-"cross" (X) the planet.

"The great work" is a eugenics program that precedes written history. Biblical "Revelations" aren't a prophecy. A revelation is a "revealing", and the plan has always been the same.

"To perfect that which the creator made imperfect." The jab is the penultimate chapter. They plan of breeding an entirely different race (multiple races really) of humanity.

As you've identified in the post, the royalty of all sides are members. They're all related to the same ancestors.

parentlinkreply
[-]LarrySwinger0(0|0)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_X

I mean, it's just the number 10 in Latin numerals. If there are rulers named Christian then sooner or later there will be the tenth of it, same with other names.

The image you posted is proxified and therefore 404s.

The mystery religion created the Bible, Christianity, and every other major religion

The books of the Tanakh, especially documents like Deutronomy, primarily have the opposite effect of uniting the Hebrews. And what did Christianity do in this aspect? It seemed to throw a wrench in the gears if anything. In order to bring about the NWO they had to systematically dismantle Christianity starting with the Protestant revolution (which was facilitated to challenge the power of the Catholic church) and later the French revolution. They did this partially because Christianity was the force that guarded the nuclear family as building block of society. If Christianity was constructed by a mystery religion to control society, then why would they later need to exert so much effort to dismantle it?

parentlinkreply
[-]Tom_Bombadil1(+1|0)

They did this partially because Christianity was the force that guarded the nuclear family as building block of society. If Christianity was constructed by a mystery religion to control society, then why would they later need to exert so much effort to dismantle it?

They needed a strong cultural foundation and a high-trust culture to build infrastructure and redevelop advanced technology.

A parallel structure is required to build any significant project. Scaffolding is a useful analog, as it's assembled to fabricate a large building, and dismantled when the project is completed.

The WEF's is already openly discussing humans as "hackable animals", because the jab is a nano tech operating system, and they expected the injections to become mandatory.

They created a high-trust society, so most people would be naive enough to allow their doctors to inject experimental and allegedly untested material into their body, over an illness that is identical to the flu. The pubic was aware of it experimental nature, but still feel for the trap.

You may recall in 2020, Moderna had a video on their website that suggested a wand could be used to update the injection for new illnesses.

The overall plan they had failed (for now); the control grid. Vaccine passports, mandatory injections, 15 min cities, CBDCs, etc.

But many people received multiple doses. I'm not sure how many injections are required to fully install and program people. The weapon is beyond comprehension of the naive herd.

You and I are currently in the endgame stages of the fight for survival of all of humanity. 5th generation warfare against a nanotech weapon that's intended to eliminate the notion of self from the mind if the individual.

Christianity is predicated upon the connection of the individual to the Creator; as the Creator cannot be found in a house made by human hands.. That's the essence of the religion. Christianity is under attack, because the jabs might fail.

So, they always run multiple operations against the people in case one of them fails. They control the opposition, be creating it's leaders.

A programmed mind is disconnected from the Creator. Should they accomplish the jab goal, then the psychological scaffolding will be removed from within the individual.

But I don't think they'll be successful this time. It's my sense that they were too deceitful in their scheming, and enough people could see through the illusion. The agents of the Creator are on the move.

I believe they have already failed. But they'll sabotage the system, and try to maintain control during the collapse. They'll reimpose the jabs if they can create the necessary conditions.

parentlinkreply
[-]LarrySwinger1(+1|0)

I'm not asking why Christianity is under attack but why it was created in the first place. I don't buy it, I think it arose as a completely organic process. In the gospel you can feel the despair in interpreting the idea of God on the cross, a saviour who gets utterly destroyed. If the events were made up (not talking about the theology here, just Jesus's biography), then they wouldn't have had Jesus crucified. There's no reason to even believe that that story would speak to people. They witnessed Jesus get crucified, and in their despair, as if by miracle, they found a story that speaks to people nonetheless, namely God as sacrifice for people's sins. These are the origins of Christianity. So where does a mystery cult play in, how did Christianity help them achieve their goals?

parentlinkreply
[-]ArcturianDeathTrap0(0|0)

But... Its da jooz

parentlinkreply