WelcomeWEFreedomWindsorEssexCounty-ActionCommunicationsRalliesResourcesSocialEventsWednesdayNightMeetings-ActivismAgoraAgorismCanadaCommonLawCommunityDataCentersDataCentresDoocracyFarmersMarketIntroductionsNaturalLawNewslettersOntarioOrganizingOutreachProjexProjexWikiRalliesResistanceAnalysisSoireesSoiréesWikiSpooksWindsorElectionsTop Subs
5
occultism - - (+6|-2)
33 meters corresponds with 108 feet(self)
15 commentsbyLarrySwinger

If you check out Alan Green's jewtube channel Bard Code you will discover that the ancients knew about not just the cubit but also the foot and meter. Unfortunately I'm unable to point to a precise video that is about this. There was something that shows that the dimensions of the sarcophagus in relation to the chamber it was found in encode both the foot and the meter.

Well, I found a further connection. 33 meters is 108.3 feet. Rounded that corresponds to 108. Both 33 and 108 are revered numbers in occult and religious circles. The former is of course the number of degrees (officially) in freemasonry. The latter is a sacred number in Hinduism and as such, interest in it developed in western esotericism, including for purposes of numerology. I don't know when an interest in 108 entered the western world, but if it had co-existed with an interest in 33 for a long time, it could independently point to ancient knowledge of both the meter and the foot, and how they relate to each other.

An adjacent fact is that the ratio between [distance moon-earth] to [diameter of moon] = 108, and that the same is true for [distance sun-earth] to [diameter of sun]. Visualized here.

What do you think? Is this a coincidence or was this relation known in esoteric circles?

@Tom_Bombadil

Comment preview

[-]newJiminy1(0|0)

Larry swinger is this occultism sub started by you?

parentlinkreply
[-]LarrySwinger2(+1|0)

yeah

parentlinkreply
[-]newJiminy1(0|0)

I'm interested in this topic, but it sucks we can't subscribe to subs, I forgot the name of the sub and had to search for it, finally refound this.

parentlinkreply
[-]LarrySwinger1(0|0)

I agree. You can save individual posts and access them from /favorites or use browser bookmarks.

parentlinkreply
[-]newJiminy1(0|0)

What is favorites, like is there a link to that on this site?

parentlinkreply
[-]LarrySwinger1(0|0)

Nope unfortunately you just have to remember or bookmark it. https://goatmatrix.net/favorites

parentlinkreply
[-]newJiminy1(0|0)

lol so confusing, that link to favorites is a user whose name is bookmarked? That's what it seems.

parentlinkreply
[-]Tom_Bombadil1(0|0)

An adjacent fact is that the ratio between [distance moon-earth] to [diameter of moon] = 108, and that the same is true for [distance sun-earth] to [diameter of sun].

The Sun and moon have mind bogglingly similar angular sizes (despite elliptical variations), and the 1:1 ratio is observed during a total solar eclipse.

And angular size is the ratio between the height of the object, divided by the distance between the object and the observer, 'n shit.

Impossible coincidences abound in this spiritual training ground.

Have you read Carl Jung's book, "The Undiscovered Self"?

parentlinkreply
[-]LarrySwinger1(0|0)

Yes. That's basically implied by the distance to diameter ratio being 108:1 for them both.

No, I haven't read it. What does he talk about in it?

parentlinkreply
[-]JasonCarswell1(+1|0)

An adjacent fact is that the ratio between [distance moon-earth] to [diameter of moon] = 108, and that the same is true for [distance sun-earth] to [diameter of sun].

Fascinating if true. And I wonder how this reflects on the Lagrange points.

Another unrelated numerical mystery:

The standard dartboard height is 5 feet 8 inches (1.73 meters) from the floor to the center of the bullseye, and the throw line (oche) is 7 feet 9 ¼ inches (2.37 meters) from the front of the dartboard for steel-tip play.

Why so seemingly random and not precisely rounded off?

parentlinkreply
[-]Tom_Bombadil1(0|0)

An adjacent fact is that the ratio between [distance moon-earth] to [diameter of moon] = 108, and that the same is true for [distance sun-earth] to [diameter of sun].

It's true, and the total solar eclipse is the evidence.

But the angle of the plane in which the moon orbits the earth, differs from the plane that the earth orbits around the sun.

If earth-sun, and moon-earth, traveled on the same plane, then eclipses would be regular occurrences...

And the arc of the covenant wouldn't be a thing...

Because the eclipses would be common along that orbital plane, and it would not have been possible to weaponize them to terrorize the masses.

The arc of the sun, as it travels a-CROSS the sky...

The Sun god promises it will rise again tomorrow... AS LONG AS YOU OBEY THOSE PRIESTS!!

parentlinkreply
[-]newJiminy1(+1|0)

Yeah like room 237 in The Shining the moon is 237,000 miles away and the moon's diameter is 2,159 miles. That ratio is 109 but of course these are estimates and the length varies. It's an ellipse actually. The diameter can slowly change too. This ratio is sacred because of the laws of the universe and you'll find other planets and moons have the same ratios. The way it varies is governed by the laws of the universe too.

parentlinkreply
[-]x0x70(0|0)

But why is the speed of light 299,792,458 m/s^2? So close to a round number. Did the devil cause a deviation?

https://grokipedia.com/page/Alexander_Grothendieck

parentlinkreply
[-]Tom_Bombadil1(0|0)

The speed of light in vacuum, often called simply the speed of light and commonly denoted c, is a universal physical constant exactly equal to 299792458 m⋅s−1.[2] It is exact because, by international agreement, a metre is defined as the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1⁄299792458 second.

It's not difficult to imagine complications in accurately measuring:

"...the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1⁄299792458 second.

And the different teams of scientists were reporting variations in their measurement results.

Assuming light travels at a constant rate in a vacuum eliminates the possibly of measuring variations...

Because, any/every physically measurable change that actually occurred in, either the speed of light, or the characteristics of the "vacuum," will be by-definition-of-measurement dismissed as measurement error. It's axiomatically assumed that variations cannot exist in either vacuums, and light.

It's possible that variations are physically impossible in BOTH vacuums and light...

But, we'll never know, because it will not be investigated, because any possible variations of either are literally engineered into the base unit, of the method of measurement.

parentlinkreply
[-]newJiminy1(0|0)

It might be that the speed of light is literally 300,000,000 m/s. And they say it's 299 whatever because it being a number like 300,000,000 sounds fake . The truth is that a perfect vacuum doesn't exist, out in space there are still molecules and atoms and other particles. So as light flies thru them it gets slowed down as it bounces off the particles. Slowing it down just a little, to 299.

It's meters per second so it could just be a coincidence in how a meter got defined hundreds of years ago. The French Revolution defined it. Could they have possibly known what the speed of light was? So they defined it as 1/300,000,000 ^th of a second? And they did this because they wanted the speed of light in their new units to come out to a nice even number. They worshipped light, it symbolizes enlightenment, were Illuminati etc.

parentlinkreply